View Full Version : Is "smoke" in CMSF actually WP?
Apocal
02-23-2009, 05:27 AM
I noticed that 155mm smoke can cause casualties, but is that just due to the impact of a shell hitting at terminal velocity or is the casualty-producing aspect of WP simulated? Also, no shake-and-bake WP/HE missions?
Elmar Bijlsma
02-23-2009, 11:45 AM
I would expect it's the simulated effect of WP.
Have you ever tried popping vehicle smoke with friendly infantry in front of the launchers? Not a good way to win friends among the ground pounders, as it turns out. It can even damage vehicles!
gibsonm
02-23-2009, 05:35 PM
Well "smoke" comes in a lot of flavours.
You mention 155mm so I gather you are referring to artillery delivered smoke (as opposed to vehicle smoke produced by Multi Barrelled Smoke Grenade Dischargers as mentioned by Elmar).
Artillery smoke can either be the cooler "base ejection" smoke that has a carrier shell that travels ballistically and dispenses smoke as it flies over the area to be obscured.
The other option for Artillery is WP.
Vehicle smoke (from grenades, not exhaust) can be either WP or "multi spectral" (i.e. TI defeating).
I don't know about flavors, but I've noticed three types:
Black: primarily Red forces
Brown: self defense smoke grenades by Blue vehicles - IR blocker.
White: artillery (Blue?)
Apocal
02-23-2009, 08:20 PM
I believe the brown is red phosphorus. Thanks for all the info though. I never realized vic smoke could damage friendlies.
MikeyD
02-23-2009, 08:53 PM
There is a difference between mortar and 155mm artillery smoke. Artillery smoke is patterned after WP so the cloud tends to rise more quickly than the cool ground-hugging HC(?) smoke for mortars. At least it did the last time I checked. In the past I've run my men through a smke screen only to find it lift over their heads before they're halfway to their destination!
BFC doesn't model the toxic effects. We may have to wait til a WWI title before they try to reproduce chemical attack. HC smoke is no walk in the park either. Sherman HC smoke rounds were a favorite against the Big Cats and anti-tank guns. Get the crew to abandon their posts, and those who didn't often were dragged out of the cloud with bright green hair from the oxodized aluminum!
Apocal
02-23-2009, 09:10 PM
There is a difference between mortar and 155mm artillery smoke. Artillery smoke is patterned after WP so the cloud tends to rise more quickly than the cool ground-hugging HC(?) smoke for mortars.
Isn't this a bit... backwards? As I understand it, artillery uses more base-discharging smoke shells than WP, while mortars fire quite a bit of WP.
Bonecrusher-17
02-23-2009, 09:19 PM
Artillery/Mortar Smoke 101:
Smoke is delivered in one of two projectiles: Burster and base ejecting.
Smoke is further classified as Quick (WP) or High Concentrate (HC) which is non WP
All U.S. Mortars now fire only WP smoke. The old 4.2in system did have a HC Smoke round. To the best of my knowledge that round wasn't inlcuded in the new M120 (Need an 11C to tell me if I'm wrong)
155mm (M109, M198, M777) can deliver WP Smoke as both bursting rounds and base ejecting. WPs advantages are its quick time to build, hence the term 'quick' smoke. The M825 'tall boy' WP Smoke uses WP soaked waffers to combine both quick build time and long duration. M825s are base ejecting
The HC Smoke is base ejecting, its slower to build but like M825 smoke it lasts longer than the bursting M118 WP smokes.
Lots of 'useless' info to win bets at the bar with.
MikeyD
02-23-2009, 09:24 PM
Huh! Interesting, I didn't know U.S. dumped HC.
HC might've just been worse for you in the long run than WP. Another definicition of 'HC' is the chemical tag hexaclorithane which was mixed with powdered aluminum to make the smoke.
gibsonm
02-23-2009, 09:32 PM
But remember there are other natures of ammunition coming on line (in the modules not yet published) besides American.
Not saying the above information is wrong, but it is important to remember it applies to US smoke ammunition and not necessarily UK or NATO natures.
Apocal
02-25-2009, 01:10 AM
But remember there are other natures of ammunition coming on line (in the modules not yet published) besides American.
Not saying the above information is wrong, but it is important to remember it applies to US smoke ammunition and not necessarily UK or NATO natures.
Does the Commonwealth or any major NATO nations differ in this respect?
gibsonm
02-25-2009, 01:13 AM
Yes, that's why I said it. :)
We for example use BE smoke and WP in Artillery rounds (there being stick ROE as to when you can use what).
Battlefront.com
02-25-2009, 01:29 AM
Bonecrusher-17.
Lots of 'useless' info to win bets at the bar with.
Thanks for the tip. If I ever bump into you at your local watering hole in the Green Mountains, I'll remember to bet a cheap beer instead of an expensive one :D
Steve
vBulletin® v3.6.10, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.